Republican Senator Tim Scott had the opportunity to criticize President Biden’s age during a recent interview but chose not to. While the topic of age and fitness for office has been a topic of discussion in recent years, Scott’s decision not to attack is notable. Let’s explore this further.

During an interview on Fox News, the host asked Scott if he believed that Biden, who will be 81 years old during the 2024 presidential election, should be considered too old to serve. Scott could have easily taken the opportunity to attack his political opponent on the topic of age. However, he chose to respond in a different way.

Scott said that he did not want to speculate on the president’s age, but rather focus on his policies and actions. Scott said that he would be looking at the president’s stance on issues like national security, taxes, and regulation.

This was a notable choice by Scott, who is seen as a potential candidate for the Republican nomination for president in 2024. While attacking President Biden on his age is a common strategy among the Republican Party, Scott chose to focus on policy instead.

It is noteworthy that Scott’s decision not to attack President Biden was a strategic one. By not focusing on age, Scott has the opportunity to distinguish himself from other Republican politicians who have taken a more aggressive stance.

This is not to say that age and fitness for office should not be discussed. However, Scott’s decision to focus on policy rather than age is a welcome change from the norm.

In conclusion, Tim Scott had the opportunity to attack President Biden on the topic of age but chose to focus on policy instead. This was a notable decision that sets Scott apart from his fellow Republican politicians. While age and fitness for office should be discussed, Scott’s choice to prioritize policy is a welcome change.